The possibilities are virtually limitless when you brew beer. There are just so many approaches, styles, and types to choose from that it can be bewildering. Actually, it can be simultaneously freeing as well. You don’t have to make a beer in a vacuum, and there is a lot of room for movement within a style. One consequence of the variety is the resulting subtle range of unique beers, which is why I can’t understand a craft brew who simply makes unimaginative beers. But that’s another issue all together.
What got me thinking about this? Well, I’m just now brewing my first lambic. Already this an interesting style, but there are various roads I had to choose in order to make the lambic mine. For instance, what was my grain bill going to include? What percentage wheat should I use? Was I going to add a small portion of one more grains to put a slight spin on the whole? These were questions I had to ask myself before I even got into the brewing process.
Hops. What about those? How do I get stale hops, which are important for the style? Is there an artificial way to do this? What type of hops? Of course, I had to do some whole leaf hops for this one. Should I put a slight spin on the style by adding aroma hops? Already the questions were stacking up.
What method best works for souring the lambic? Sour mash? Bacterial strain additions? Both? I think you get the picture, and there is a lot more that I could add. For instance, I could have varied my mash temps to get a different beer. Here is the point. A lager isn’t just a lager any more than a lambic is just a lambic. It all depends in whose hands the recipe falls. So, the admonition is twofold. One, if you brew, just have a blast with experimentation because there are many variables that can make the “same” beer vastly different. Two, don’t just pass by a beer based on style. Find a brewer who puts unique signatures on beers and enjoy them for all their worth.
Amen.
[Reply]
As someone who is starting with extracts, I know enough even now to get a chuckle out of “clone” beer kits. I think my next brew will be a clone kit of Bell’s Double Hearted, but I expect that it’ll have it’s own unique taste, especially in my inexperienced hands. It’ll still be good I hope, but it will be different.
There are too many variables for me to replicate the beer exactly, and that’s part of the fun of homebrewing. Once I get rolling and using all grain, my system will produce a slightly different beer than yours even with the same recipe, just because of all the variables (and imperfections) in the process.
[Reply]
Right, Jim. I mean, something as simple as the water you have or fermentation temp can play a role. Amazing stuff.
I’m sure your clone will be great. I don’t have anything against it when people are starting out. But the more you learn, the more you should experiment…but some breweries are content to be run of the mill.
[Reply]
So true. I’ve read about commercial breweries who were producing a flagship beer for years, then changed brewing locations and the beer changed. Same recipe, same process, but a different location and a different beer. As Jim said there are too many variables to exactly duplicate a recipe. I for one am a fan of clone beers. Not so much to replicate one of my favorite beers, but to challenge myself to make it better. I also like to use clone recipes as foundations since they are proven. Then I’ll add my own tweak here and there to see what happens.
[Reply]
Thanks, Billy. The way I approach a brew is like a recipe. I look for common denominators and go from there, adding my own flare. I agree that it’s virtually impossible to replicate exactly. Even AB, which has been brewing the same swill for a long time, has trouble sometimes (and their in the same place). It’s an interesting idea that beer is continually changing. I think about things like the serial re-pitching of yeast. It’s a living organism that changes aspects of a beer.
As to the clone thing, I’m not railing on that per se. The fact that you add your own tweak means that you are simply not content to leave it as is…and that’s a good thing.
[Reply]