Always a contested topic, the United States legal age for consumption hit national headlines this past July as a South Carolina Judge ruled that it was unconstitutional for any American over the age of 18 to be legally forbidden to posses and consume alcohol. Attorney Joe McCulloch states, “Article 17, Section 14 of the state constitution conditionally gives those 18 and over the ‘full legal rights and responsibilities’ of all other adults, with one exception — the General Assembly can restrict the sale of alcohol.”
While many accept rulings and national legislation at face value, it never hurts to question the reasoning behind such accepted laws, as McCulloch has (Note Florida’s protest as well). After all, this particular piece of legislation is a bit peculiar when considered globally. If one peruses the vast online world of foreign brewery websites, they will notice a difference in law and attitude regarding this topic, as many sites only restrict those under the age of 18 from entering, contra a typical US website that insist on 21. If one looks at world wide alcohol laws, the United States is the minority in requiring a citizen to attain to the age of 21 before purchasing and/or consuming a beer. In fact Palau and the United Arab Emirates aside, the United States is the only nation holding to 21.
Besides, as Legal Libations points out: In the United States you can drive, buy a house, go to war, marry and divorce before you may even legally hold a beer. Think about it this way: The federal government will entrust an eighteen year old fresh out of high school with a brand new, fully loaded M16 but not a license to buy a beer.
So why 21?
Oddly enough, the federal government does not mandate and enforce a nationwide drinking age of 21; kind of. Remember, this is The United States of America. States’ rights are built into the constitution as the U.S. first existed as individual territories so to speak, even using different forms of currency. Most states had set the age to 21 by the time of the Vietnam war. However, as hordes of youngsters were drafted in to battle the Vietcong, many states responded sympathetically by lowering the legal age down to 18. Who wants to forage througha sweltering booby trapped jungle and not be allowed a cold one to relax to in the evening? But in the late seventies and early 80′s, the nation began to notice a rise in alcohol related automobile accidents. Several states responded by raising the legal age of consumption back to 21, but not all. In response to the unfortunate new trend Ronald Reagan, in 1984, signed into law The Uniform Drinking Age Act, that pressured states into mandating a legal drinking age of 21.
States still have somewhat sovereignty, however, and can choose to disregard this act, yet not without consequences. Over the years since our existence as a nation, the states have grown more dependent on federal funding for all sorts of programs. Under the Federal Highway Act, states who choose to ignore the Uniform Drinking Act are subject to a penalty of 10% less of an annual federal highway apportionment. Whether good times or bad, this is quite a chunk!
It always seems to come down to money.
With South Carolina’s recent defiance of status quo, the question again is up in the air. Is 21 too old? If a man or woman is willing (or forced) into dying for their country, should they be allowed a brew? Or, should military enlistment age be raised to 21? Is this a denial of a right of adulthood; a.k.a. Age Discrimination?
Who is responsible for the responsibility of a fledgling adult? Themselves? The State? Parents?
The President of Johns Hopkins Recently Said: “Kids are going to drink whether it’s legal or not. We’d at least be able to have a more open dialogue with students about drinking, as opposed to this sham where people don’t want to talk about it because it’s a violation of the law.” I see his point. Binge drinking seems more likely to occur when the very act of drinking an alcoholic beverage must be done in secret.
So we ask you, should the drinking age be lowered to 18 in your state, and why or why not?
As someone from one of the countries where it’s 18, I will just say thanks for enlightening me as to the reasons behind this bizarre anomaly.
And note that when I was visiting Germany in high school, it was very weird to be able to buy a beer at 16 … at McDonalds…
[Reply]
Ha! I went to Germany in highschool too and was amazed by the beer at McDonald’s. I didn’t buy any back then, though. Same thing in Hungary…beer in Burger King. I think this is a good idea for another article.
[Reply]
Alcohol laws in the US are completely ridiculous. You can do absolutely anything when you turn 18 except for buy beer or run for Congress or President. One might speculate the government rules are there because they know an 18 year old president would fix the whole no beer issue. I don’t expect the neo-prohibitionist movement (namely MADD) will let these laws change anytime soon.
My wife and I have already made the decision that the drinking age in our house will always be 18, with stipulations. #1 it only applies to my daughter, not any of her friends, and #2 one drop of alcohol and you don’t leave the house for the day. I believe that parents are responsible for demonstrating and teaching that alcohol is another beverage choice, not fuel for stupidity. The notion of making it illegal for kids is completely pointless because it forces them to hide it, makes them want it more, and causes them to over-do it when they get their hands on it, which isn’t that hard in the first place.
It’s really easy to curb drunk driving. Mandatory prison sentences, even for first offenders, will surely make more people think twice. Life in prison with no hope for parole for an alcohol-related accident resulting in death is another thing we should have. I take drinking and driving extremely serious, and I don’t do it under any circumstances. Lowering the limits isn’t going to change anything either, we need more severe repricussions.
[Reply]
@howardf – I’m with you on that. as a brewer and consumer of beer, it is a common house hold item. My kids (little) know not to touch Daddy’s beer stuff, but i have concerns as they get older and how should it be handled in MY HOUSE. The more “things” are hidden and forbidden from kids, just increases their natural curiosity and some just cannot handle it.
While my kids see me drink I never am drunk in front of them. As a drinker and a Parent it is my responsibility to show them (by example) how to be responsible. Also my wife is pretty much a non drinker, so they also see that they don’t have to be a consumer to have an enjoyable time.
Maybe there are some alternatives to the hard 21 birthday precipices. We force people, minors to get permits before they drive, maybe there are restrictions to the quantity of beer they can purchase from 18-21.
Who knows what is right or wrong, some people don’t “grow-up” or “become responsible” just because they turn 21. Why not 25? 21 is such an arbitrary number for that matter 18 is too, but cigarettes are much more dangerous (in my opinion) then beer but you can buy them at 18 in most states. I can get married, have kids at 16,17,18 legally in most states too… Who’s to say that is any better?
[Reply]
Good post again Nate. I actually think that the drinking age should be lowered to 18, but as howardf stated, the drunk driving laws should be stiffened and more strictly enforced. Still, I’m not a fan of police roadblocks but that’s a different topic.
It’s the parent’s role to set the proper example for their kids, unfortunately, many parents just suck at being parents. That’s where the nanny state comes in with arbitrary age restrictions, sin taxes and the like because many parents are just not responsible either. (Do those ”The More You Know” commercials on NBC piss anyone else off, or is it just me?)
Teach kids to be responsible and to make good decisions, be a good role model to them, and then as they are growing up and they get older they won’t have problems with things like beer, cars, drugs or guns.
Problems with women is a completely different thing though!
[Reply]
Old enough to go to war for your country…. old enough to have a drink
[Reply]
Thanks for all the well thought out responses…seriously, I think they ALL are well educated. I intentionally TRIED not to weave my opinion into the article, but actually everyone has nearly perfectly voiced my thoughts. Like everyone else, I think it is the responsibility of parents to instruct their kids on civic responsibility at ALL levels. Perhaps the best way to do this is to spend quality time with them and let your actions do most the talking. Like @simplybeer, I will never let my kids see me drunk or buzzed, although I do drink in front of them.
Society plays a huge role too. Our society has tiered off celbratory ages: 16, Drive. 18, cigarettes, porn, gambling, 21 drunkenness. Note that these days 21 is not affiliated with alcohol consumption, but gross consumption. If all of these stages were achieved at once, there would be less of a tendency to overindulge in the forbidden fruit.
Another major problem, I feel is a typical American teens view on college. They don’t see it as an opportunity to learn and develop their mind, but merely a card punch: clocking in; a means to an end. A unfortunate but necessary step on the way towards a career. Thus, less time is spent developing themselves as a person and more time is spent binge drinking.
Sooooo…personally, for me, I don’t approve of 21 either, and actually think that their should be no nationalized age whatsoever, but rather the age is to be decided by the parent/guardian.
Again, thanks for the comments. I loved reading them all.
[Reply]
I am with the notion that it is not age but responsibility. Good examples, early exposure, and tough legislation against alcohol related crimes are key to making this work. I don’t even think that 18 or 21 are the only two options. We really ought to consider responsibility as primary.
[Reply]
I have something to add. Last year while on vacation in the Bahamas, our 16 year old son, who looks well over 18, dressed up and went to the casino with us and ordered his own beer. We allowed this with his us, his parents so he would think it was’t so special if enticed by his friends. He only wanted one beer. This year we went to Aruba. At 17 he ordered his own drink. He only ordered one each day. Take what you want from this, he showed personal responsibility when given freedom to make his own choices around parents who drank responsible. By the way we are Christians who don’t look at having a beer as a sin.
[Reply]
Thanks Ellen. I can’t help but reiterate that responsibility is simply key.
[Reply]
Thanks for the comment, Ellen. It really made my day. Your comment only strengthens the argument that maturity is not achieved by an event (like a 21st birthday) but by an understanding of responsibility through a good upbringing. I know a few people in their 30′s who should have a personal legal drinking age of 45!
[Reply]
[...] Having recently contemplated the intricacies (and odditites!) of the U.S. Drinking Age, I began to ponder why a beer website, such as Sam Adams needed such strict age checking before visiting their site. Is it really necessary? I mean, Samuel Adams does not sell any of there fermented product on their site (although they do offer a pretty rad Ski Lift Beer Tray…which I must have). Besides, correct me if I’m wrong, but the brief and markedly credible research I’ve done has shown that even sites selling beer do not legally have to verify age upon entrance to the site, only upon checkout. Consider this…it would be like Wal-Mart denying your accompanying six year old entrance to their super-center for fears that he might catch a glimpse of some God-awful, commercially owned, swill of a beer in aisle 13. What’s next? Will there be a ten second lag of white noise this next Superbowl so that parents can clear the room of all the virgin eyes and ears before 3 cute toads fill the screen and croak praises to Budweiser? [...]
you know before I turned 21 I was still able to get my hands on a beer every now and then but didn’t really start drinking till I turned 21… either way it sucks because now I drink literally every day.. I’m 22.
I think the legal drinking age should be raised to 25 when your old enough to make a better decision about something that can become addictive. If not legalize marijuana because I’d much rather be addicted to that than alcohol. At least marijuana isn’t as bad for you as alcohol.
[Reply]
Why not lower the drinking age to 18 for people in the military?
[Reply]
Angel,
I understand some of the sentiments you are expressing, I really do. However, the primary issue, in my mind, is responsibility. Some people make poor decisions to drink excessively at 50 or 60 years old. Point being, that the excesses of some should not dictate the rules for all. We’re advocates of early exposure done in a responsible manner. There are plenty of places in the world where people can drink at 16. In my opinion, our social woes in America have to do with not culturing an attitude of responsibility and maturity. It’s less about the age and more about expectations.
[Reply]
@Josh. I do think people who can fight with a gun ought to be able to sit with a beer.
[Reply]
It’s all about litigation, I believe, that keeps the US from lowering the drinking age. Parents, schools and religious organizations want to protect teens, young adults and themselves from drunk driving litigation. That’s what it’s really all about. Take driving out of the picture in this country and I think you’d find that the drinking age wouldn’t matter. But once young adults get behind the wheel then it’s suddenly a major issue.
Young adults also have to learn, often the hard way, what their alcohol limits are. The first few years of being exposed to alcohol (let alone just beer) are the hardest ones to learn. Teens don’t set realistic limits on alcohol consumption. It takes lots of sessions of experience to learn that.
Experienced drinkers tend to drink to savor the beer, whereas inexperienced drinkers enjoy drinking til they puke. It’s the high they are after, not the flavor.
I think if American started allowing 16-20 year olds to drink under supervision at home and slowly break them in and let them learn their limits then the binge drinking problem wouldn’t be a bad as it is now and I think the drinking age could be lowered.
How about allowing 16-20 year olds get a license to drink? This license would come at a hefty price but would allow them to drink lower alcoholic beverages and eventually graduate up to hard liquor by the time they are 21. If they are caught and found guilty of drunkedness then their license to buy and drink would be taken away. Sure it buracracy and paperwork, but it might just work. Require an alcohol education class and a lab where they have to learn their limits before they are allowed to get their license to consume alcohol.
[Reply]
I think the litigation side is a good point. There is an underlying and particular morality that dictates that sue happy attitude, which is what I really think it’s about.
The “license” to drink may not be a bad idea for bridging us in the right direction. My hope is that the household and society will start accepting drinking as a normative and responsible behavior. Attitude about it dictates a lot.
[Reply]
[...] may like this article on a similar subject: Is 21 Years Too Long To Wait For A Beer? Spread the [...]