<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Oatmeal Stout by Schlafly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/03/23/review-of-oatmeal-stout-by-schlafly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/03/23/review-of-oatmeal-stout-by-schlafly/</link>
	<description>We love beer, we thank heaven.  Begrudgingly, we admit we are not the authority on all things &#34;beer,&#34; but we know our fair share.  Enjoy the good brew with us; correct us where we&#039;re wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 05:49:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: beer_scientist</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/03/23/review-of-oatmeal-stout-by-schlafly/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>beer_scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=1393#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>There is no comparison.  I&#039;ve always thought that Samuel Smith&#039;s had a slightly Soy Sauce quality to it, which is its only imperfection.  Otherwise, it is an astounding beer.  Schlafly doesn&#039;t even hold a matchstick, let alone a candle to Samuel Smith&#039;s.  Having said that, I&#039;ve had one or two Oatmeal Stouts that I&#039;ve liked more than Samuel Smith.  You&#039;re right, it is the standard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no comparison.  I&#8217;ve always thought that Samuel Smith&#8217;s had a slightly Soy Sauce quality to it, which is its only imperfection.  Otherwise, it is an astounding beer.  Schlafly doesn&#8217;t even hold a matchstick, let alone a candle to Samuel Smith&#8217;s.  Having said that, I&#8217;ve had one or two Oatmeal Stouts that I&#8217;ve liked more than Samuel Smith.  You&#8217;re right, it is the standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/03/23/review-of-oatmeal-stout-by-schlafly/comment-page-1/#comment-1438</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=1393#comment-1438</guid>
		<description>How would you compare it to Smith&#039;s? More or less the standard in Oatmeal Stouts, in California anyhow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would you compare it to Smith&#8217;s? More or less the standard in Oatmeal Stouts, in California anyhow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
