Per “DryGuy’s” request, here is an article about N/A beers. Usually, for me, the N/A stands for not applicable when it comes to non-alcoholic beers, but this was very applicable for many during prohibition. As you might have guessed, N/A beers got their start during prohibition when alcoholic beers were banned in the USA. One could obtain whiskey and other spirits via a doctor’s prescription, but for all intents and purposes, alcohol was illegal. Consequently (and tellingly), this caused organized crime to flourish in the U.S. (not a very good trade off in my opinion).
Because of the ban on alcoholic beers, “near beer” was created. A popular and pithy saying during prohibition was, “Near beer sold here.” However, where there was “near beer,” there was always real alcohol for sale in close proximity. For this reason, another popular slogan was created, “Near beer sold here, real beer sold real near here.” Near beer and other malt products were the brewery’s way of trying to stay afloat during the era. One more thing ought to be mentioned. Prohibition also choked out many smaller breweries in the U.S. This happened to such an extent that we Americans got used to the inferior beer of the brewing giants. Not only is this true for real beer but also for “near beers.”
So how is a “near beer” made? There is no need to cover the ground of brewing (I’ve already posted 5 or 6 articles on this site to explain the process). The process for non-alcoholic brews is exactly the same as traditional methods with one exception; at the end of fermentation the beer is heated. Since water and alcohol evaporate at different points, the heated alcohol leaves the beer. The temperature that achieves this is in the neighborhood of the 170s-80s F. There is also a process that is used which involves filtering out the alcohol, but this is less common. So the primary means of taking out the alcohol or most of it (there is still one half of one percent) is to heat it. As a side note, alcohol freezes at different temps than water, and one particular style of beer is partially frozen (and the ice taken out) to give the beer added strength. This is called an Eisbock. What a difference between hot and cold.
One might be inclined to think that N/A beers are few and far between, but this is not the case. There is an increasingly large market for these beers. All of the major breweries make a N/A beer. This is not the end, however. Guinness makes a N/A beer called Kaliber, and I expect that other major importers will come out with their own versions. So for those who drink N/As there are many more viable options coming around the bend. Cheers to my peers who sip near beers. Here is a link to find some of the best N/A beers, including Kaliber. That link is to purchase Kaliber and learn a little. Here is another link to find out about more N/A beers. This link is an article and list of good N/A beers. This is simply a list.
I didn’t know that NA came about during the prohibition…I had assumed it was a more recent development made with recovering alcoholics in minds (because when I tended bar EVERY guy who came in ordered Odouls sheepishly explained his choice as such). Very interesting article. I’g glad DryGuy suggested it.
You can take the alcohol out of my beer, BUT YOU’LL NEVER TAKE MY BEER OUT OF ALCOHOL!!!!
[Reply]
[...] beer_scientist wrote a fantastic post today on “Whatâ
Nate,
I do think that, for the most part, N/A beers are often drunk for the exact reason you mentioned. You do have to remember that these still contain alcohol. 10 n/a beers equals 5% alcohol beer. So, it turns out that the alcoholic still gets alcohol. Are we really addressing the problem when the alcoholic still gets some alcohol?
[Reply]
beer_scientist,
Your math is flawed. Percentages are constant so 10 N/A beers does not equal 5% alcohol beer. It may equal one 5% beer but most who drink N/A beer drink one or two in place of their favorite malty adult beverage. Not all who abstain from alcohol are alcoholics. Most who drink N/A beer exclusively are doing so out of moderation. Some, like me, prefer beer to soda, etc. Sodas average 150 or more calories per serving whereas N/A beers are closer to 75 cal/serving.
If your point is that alcoholics (actual physically dependent ones) cannot tolerate alcohol, I agree that they should avoid N/A beers. I know plenty of “recovering alcoholics” who can enjoy a couple of N/A beers without turning into binging monsters.
[Reply]
I did mean that 10 N/A beers does equal one 5% alcohol beer, so my math was correct in that regard. What I was saying by the statement was that 10 N/A beers is equal, alcohol wise, to 5% beer (as in one 5% alcohol beer).
If you think my characterization of the fact that most people who drink non-alcoholic beer are those who over-indulge is unfair (which I don’t think that it is an unfair statement), your characterization of what I said is more than equally unfair.
You are building a straw-man argument about what I said and missing my primary point. First of all, I never said that all people who abstain from alcoholic beverages are alcoholics (you did). The purpose of the article was to explain where N/A beer came from and how it was made. I argued that it was from prohibition, not alcoholism. I also made the point that this was a bad thing.
You actually helped my point along when you said you knew people who were “recovering alcoholics” that drank N/A beer. If you remember what was said it was, people OFTEN (not always) drink N/A because drinking real beer is a problem. And you conceded that physically dependent alcoholics should avoid N/A beers because they are actually getting some alcohol (which was the point of what I wrote to Nate). And I know some people who can drink some N/A beers without turning into binging monsters, too (as if I called them monsters). That still doesn’t detract from the point that alcoholics still get alcohol when they drink N/A beer. The point of using 10 beers was to show that, no matter how miniscule, there is still alcohol present.
As far as how your defining moderation…having N/A beers instead of regular beer, I don’t really understand what you mean. If you mean that drinking N/A beers instead of regular beers is moderation, I absolutely disagree. Moderation means to avoid excess, extremes, or have reasonable limits. So, one or two regular beers may be considered moderation. For the non-alcoholic, one or two N/A beers is effectively abstaining. The case is different for the alcoholic (I think I’ve made that point above).
Again, I can’t help but point out that this is not really what the article was about. But if you were offended by my later statement, then I can apologize for the fact that it is a sensitive issue and that could have been better explained.
[Reply]
Kudos to both Mike and Nate for opening the forum to this discussion. My personal decision re: NA beers is one of abstention, not moderation. Nor am I in recovery. I love the taste from time to time, and the NA solution–when appearing in a flavorful variety–skirts lots of issues for me. Thus my post.
I have recently enjoyed Guiness’ Kaliber, and now am sampling (I don’t have the exact name in front of me) Pauliner (?). Beck’s has also impressed me, as has (perhaps surprisingly) O’doul’s Amber. I’m hoping to find something a little darker, though, and wonder if the web link entitled “Kaliber” above can be checked for function…I can’t get it to connect.
Thanks, guys, for the stimulating discussion!
[Reply]
I’ll look into the link Brad. I know it was current when I put it up…maybe the site for the kaliber link is gone. Thanks for stopping by.
[Reply]
It’s fixed Brad. P.S thanks for offering an opinion that was fair and not at all jerky like other ones.
[Reply]
Thanks for stopping by again DryGuy.
I agree with your opinion re. NA and abstention. The only time NA floats around our household is when my non-alcoholic-wife is pregnant and has a taste for beer.
Maybe you should consider guest posting here on the site sometime…
[Reply]
Not sure what I have to offer, but I do enjoy your and beer_scientist’s posts. This is a quality site…engaging, eclectic, and informed.
Much the way I like my NA Beers….
[Reply]