Nate’s post on guilty pleasure beers got me thinking about some of the beers, like Red Stripe, that are my guilty pleasure beers. I considered putting Fat Tire by New Belgian as one of them. But after hanging out with a friend tonight and putting nostalgia aside, Fat Tire is really a balanced and good beer.
Forget the measures of niche uniqueness and abstractions about it simply being an Amber Ale among Imperial Stouts. Seriously, the grain pop and session smoothness of it makes me want to write a brief post about the beer. It also makes me curious about the point at which an Amber Ale became and implicit anathema among crafties (I’ve never heard the term so I’m coining it…at least in my mind). To be honest, I can get on board with notion that the ubiquitous Amber Ales at the the seemingly endless brew pubs are mediocre or worse. However, I can’t get hop on the conceptual train that writes off a whole category of beer.
It may be an inspired rant or it may seem like sentimental drivel, depending on your outlook, but why is solid beer getting such a bad name? To be clear, I enjoy wasabi flavored ice cream with sushi mix-ins as much as the next person, but I sometimes long for the well made vanilla.
Am I crazy? What do you think? And I mean the rest of what I’ve said, not my mental status…perhaps that’s self-evident.
I have never had Fat Tire, so I cannot weigh in on the good/bad about it. But I have stated many times that I feel that craft brewers (especially new brewpubs) are focusing on their special release beers, while allowing their standard beers to go south. I love a well put together pale ale. I have had way too many that taste watered down, little malt, little hop. It upsets me. Or they make a IPA by just blasting it with twice the amount of hops. Give it a little more complexity, or maybe it just needs a little more attention.
Back to the basics, and yes, amber ales are good.
[Reply]
nate Reply:
January 21st, 2011 at 11:31 am
I agree…the basics need to be revisited. I myself have been brewing inexpensive session or session-ish brews lately.
[Reply]
michael reinhardt Reply:
January 21st, 2011 at 1:35 pm
Love the basics.
[Reply]
Mike, I’ve actually been working towards getting a post like this written. I’m focusing solely on the Lager, though. It has been bugging me that solid HISTORIC beers are now being snubbed.
[Reply]
michael reinhardt Reply:
January 21st, 2011 at 12:04 pm
Me too. Been writing what I think will be a 3000 word post on Pils.
[Reply]
Good points, and maybe that’s why people seem to love this beer? I had it once, and it just didn’t do anything for me. If I never had it again, I wouldn’t feel like I was missing anything. Thankfully, it isn’t available in NJ so I don’t feel too guilty about not giving Fat Tire a second try!
[Reply]
michael reinhardt Reply:
January 24th, 2011 at 12:10 pm
I think I just like being able to have a good beer and not have to analyze it to death. It’s just a refreshing experience.
[Reply]
Yep. Celebrator is like that for me.
[Reply]