<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten Reasons For Coors Light Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/</link>
	<description>We love beer, we thank heaven.  Begrudgingly, we admit we are not the authority on all things &#34;beer,&#34; but we know our fair share.  Enjoy the good brew with us; correct us where we&#039;re wrong.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 16:48:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Top Ten Reasons For Coors Light Recall &#124; Thank Heaven for Beer [thankheavenforbeer.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Top Ten Reasons For Coors Light Recall &#124; Thank Heaven for Beer [thankheavenforbeer.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>[...] Top Ten Reasons For Coors Light Recall &#124; Thank Heaven for Beer  thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  MillerCoors recently recalled cans of cold Coors Light after the company determined the batch, brewed at the MillerCoors Georgia brewery  was subpar.  A &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top Ten Reasons For Coors Light Recall | Thank Heaven for Beer  thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  MillerCoors recently recalled cans of cold Coors Light after the company determined the batch, brewed at the MillerCoors Georgia brewery  was subpar.  A &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: beer_scientist</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4621</link>
		<dc:creator>beer_scientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4621</guid>
		<description>They should be focusing on quality.  However, they start out with inferior products and make an inferior beer.  Might as well do something flash to take people&#039;s mind of the fact that they are drinking crap.  It&#039;s a bit like watching a nurse distract an infant with something while the doctor puts the needle in.  Only these are beer babies watching a flashy can instead of what&#039;s happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be focusing on quality.  However, they start out with inferior products and make an inferior beer.  Might as well do something flash to take people&#8217;s mind of the fact that they are drinking crap.  It&#8217;s a bit like watching a nurse distract an infant with something while the doctor puts the needle in.  Only these are beer babies watching a flashy can instead of what&#8217;s happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avocado876</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4609</link>
		<dc:creator>Avocado876</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4609</guid>
		<description>...Oh, bummer: on a closer reading of this, I see that the mountains-turning-red-instead-of-blue thing didn&#039;t actually... happen.  I&#039;m very disappointed; there would have been poetic justice in that.  So the recall was actually a recall on account of the quality of the ACTUAL PRODUCT.  So, sounds like maybe Coors ought to be focusing more on the quality of their product than on labels that turn blue if they&#039;re &quot;certifiably cold&quot; or whatever their asinine phrasing is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Oh, bummer: on a closer reading of this, I see that the mountains-turning-red-instead-of-blue thing didn&#8217;t actually&#8230; happen.  I&#8217;m very disappointed; there would have been poetic justice in that.  So the recall was actually a recall on account of the quality of the ACTUAL PRODUCT.  So, sounds like maybe Coors ought to be focusing more on the quality of their product than on labels that turn blue if they&#8217;re &#8220;certifiably cold&#8221; or whatever their asinine phrasing is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avocado876</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator>Avocado876</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4608</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t watch enough television, I guess, because I just became aware of this Cold-Activated Can thing tonight.  It has to be the stupidest, most misguided marketing gimmick ever.  (Actually, there must be worse ones, but I really can&#039;t think of one.)  Recall or not (and yes, recalling a flawed product is the right thing to do, but is it possible that this is the first product recalled, ever, because of a flaw IN ITS LABEL?), this idea will not last.  It&#039;ll last slightly longer than Starbucks&#039; &quot;sipping chocolate&quot; (that is, super-super-super-super-super-strong hot chocolate) did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t watch enough television, I guess, because I just became aware of this Cold-Activated Can thing tonight.  It has to be the stupidest, most misguided marketing gimmick ever.  (Actually, there must be worse ones, but I really can&#8217;t think of one.)  Recall or not (and yes, recalling a flawed product is the right thing to do, but is it possible that this is the first product recalled, ever, because of a flaw IN ITS LABEL?), this idea will not last.  It&#8217;ll last slightly longer than Starbucks&#8217; &#8220;sipping chocolate&#8221; (that is, super-super-super-super-super-strong hot chocolate) did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4412</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 12:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4412</guid>
		<description>Howard, that is a good point.

When I used to tend bar, I had regular customers who only drank one variety of american light beer.  If you tried to pull one over on them, like give them a bud light in stead of a coors light, they would know and send the beer back.

I respect the recall.  I wish I could have sampled a tainted can to see what the error was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Howard, that is a good point.</p>
<p>When I used to tend bar, I had regular customers who only drank one variety of american light beer.  If you tried to pull one over on them, like give them a bud light in stead of a coors light, they would know and send the beer back.</p>
<p>I respect the recall.  I wish I could have sampled a tainted can to see what the error was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howardf</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4410</link>
		<dc:creator>howardf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 04:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4410</guid>
		<description>The one I heard ( which is actually plausible) was that they accidentally put Keystone Light into Coors Light cans.  All joking aside, it&#039;s good to see a company put their customers first and pull a product that wasn&#039;t right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one I heard ( which is actually plausible) was that they accidentally put Keystone Light into Coors Light cans.  All joking aside, it&#8217;s good to see a company put their customers first and pull a product that wasn&#8217;t right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4402</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4402</guid>
		<description>3 or 7?  I put them in reverse order.
It actually took me a while to compile this list...I had writer&#039;s block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 or 7?  I put them in reverse order.<br />
It actually took me a while to compile this list&#8230;I had writer&#8217;s block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://thankheavenforbeer.com/2009/06/04/top-ten-reasons-for-coors-light-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-4401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thankheavenforbeer.com/?p=2265#comment-4401</guid>
		<description>Damn, I was going to say something along the lines of 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, I was going to say something along the lines of 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
